Nagkomento ni Davao Representative Paolo Duterte seknan iti mannarimaan nga International Criminal Court Confirmation of Charges Hearing kontra kenni sigud a President Rodrigo Duterte nga ama na.
Iti impablaak daytoy iti social media account na, kinuwestionaranna ti hurisdiksyon ti korte iti kaso ti sigud a presidente.
Sigun kenkuana, naglusolusen ti Pilipinas iti Rome Statute ken nu maipanggep ti International Criminal Court, pilpilien lang dagitoy ti sovereignty da depende nu asino ti kayatda nga i-target.
Kinuwestionaranna pay ti crimes against humanity a kaso a sangsangwen ni ama daytoy ken dinakamatna ti double standard ti nasao a korte.
Sigun kenkuana, saan a para iti hustisya ken accountability ti nasao a hearing nu di ket selective prosecution laeng.
Innayonna a maysa a banag ti nalawag kenkuana, saan a kasapulan a makumpirmar ti maipanggep ti Philippine Sovereignty. //Bombo KCS
Ti pakabuklan a komento ni Congressman Paolo Duterte:
𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘍𝘦𝘣𝘳𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘺 23–28, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦—𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘢 𝘴𝘰-𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 “𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴” 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘙𝘰𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘰 𝘙𝘰𝘢 𝘋𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦.
𝘒𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘱 𝘯𝘪𝘭𝘢, 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯—𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘥𝘪𝘬𝘴𝘺𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘺𝘰?
𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺, 𝘴𝘢 𝘐𝘊𝘊, 𝘰𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘵𝘺—𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵.
𝘋𝘪 𝘬𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘐𝘊𝘊, 𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘬𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘰 𝘬𝘢𝘢𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘬𝘢 𝘯𝘨𝘢 𝘬𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦.
𝘗𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘢, 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘥𝘪𝘬𝘴𝘺𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘬𝘢𝘺𝘰, 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘱𝘰 𝘯𝘨 𝘬𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥 𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘢𝘺𝘢𝘯?
𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘰—𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘯𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘰𝘸, 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴.
𝘜𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯? 𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴.
𝘕𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘬𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘸𝘢 𝘱𝘢, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 “𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴,” 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘥𝘳𝘶𝘨𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘢𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥-𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺. 𝘏𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘬 𝘴𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦.
𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘦𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴.
𝘈𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘈𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘰, 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘭 𝘶𝘨 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨-𝘶𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘨𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪-𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘶𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘢 𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘏𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢.
𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘴𝘪 𝘗𝘙𝘙𝘋, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘢 𝘮𝘨𝘢 𝘥𝘳𝘶𝘨 𝘱𝘶𝘴𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩 —𝘥𝘢𝘺𝘰𝘯 “𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺” 𝘯𝘢?
𝘛𝘢𝘯-𝘢𝘸𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘔𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘬𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘢𝘯-𝘢𝘸𝘢 𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘢𝘨𝘶𝘣𝘰𝘵 𝘬𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘩𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘰𝘬 𝘮𝘰-𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘢 𝘬𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥.
𝘓𝘦𝘵’𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘱 𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺.
𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘋𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘭. 𝘏𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘴—𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘳-𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘮𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺.
𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺.
𝘐𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦.
𝘚𝘰 𝘺𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴.
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘵𝘴.
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴.
𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦, 𝘸𝘦 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺—
𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘶𝘱 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.
